New Pessimism Notes: Spittle
Spittle -
not just the formless spider gob itself, but the production of it, the metamorphosis when it goes from being saliva to being spittle, like magma to lava, the "expectoration" (that word flawless, as it includes flinging expectations themselves to the ground to be trodden on) -
is the crucial substance of pessimism. More than the melancholic's bile, which is petulantly hoarded, except in moments of sickness, and only then, it only comes out as a last resort and against one's wishes. No, spittle is pessimism's moronic Promethean labor, transformative and active, the tossing forth of what should lubricate good speech, the consumption of food, kisses.
Instead, kicked out to spite a word (that which has not been fully spoken but which has wound itself through all the liquid of the mouth), a rich man ("someone took him into a magnificent house and warned him not to spit, whereupon having cleared his throat he spat into the man's face, being unable, he said, to find a baser place", of which Cioran write, "Who, after being received by a rich man, has not longed oceans of saliva to expectorate on all the owners of the earth? And who has not swallowed his own spittle for fear of casting it in the face of some stout and respected thief?", such that one swallows one's hostile. How can an ulcer be a surprise?), a civilization (“Whenever I pronounce the word civilization,” Gaugin cried, “I spit.”).
I think, though, of what it means to spit during a rainstorm.
I think of the dollar thrown into the spittoon and why, before whiskey-desperate Dude can fish it out of the slime, Chance kicks the spittoon away. How Dude knocks Chance out cold.
'Orbitecture II: Everything under heaven is in utter chaos; the situation is excellent'
'Orbitecture II: Everything under heaven is in utter chaos; the situation is excellent'
curated by Cedar Lewisohn and Focal Point Gallery
18 April to 11 June 2011
curated by Cedar Lewisohn and Focal Point Gallery
18 April to 11 June 2011
Artists include: Gerd Arntz, Ray Brassier, Pim Conradi, johnny de philo, Romain Gavras, The Gut Club, Head Gallery, Eileen Joy, Dean Kenning, Rachel Kushner, Patricia MacCormack, Alastair MacKinven, Man Like Me, Nicola Masciandaro, Robin MacKay, China Miéville, Stephen Molyneux, Reza Negarestani, Benjamin Noys, Laura Oldfield Ford, David Osbaldeston, PLANNINGTOROCK, Nina Power, Hillary Raphael, Francis Thorburn, and Evan Calder Williams.
The state counts for you, and it's never wrong
---
[Raymond Bernard's Les Miserables, 4 hours, 39 minutes, from '34, the same year as L'Atalante, and with that, the other grounding post of directions to be followed by films that are interested in film. I thought it standard DVD rerelease hyperbole to speak of "one of the greatest and least-known directors of all time." I thought wrong. This is brutal and correct, obsessed with the venomous neutrality of the contract, of writing away your rights. Doubling back and back onto the dwindling sums of those with no reserves, their names held onto and drawn forth by the state in all its forms and malignant facilitators.]
World Melodrama Film Series Presents: María Candelaria (1944)
There are things that bleed if you so much as touch them.
This week we turn from Marlene Dietrich’s horsey Russian empress to arguably the most iconic example of Mexican melodrama’s suffering woman figure, Dolores del Rio’s titular role as the virginal Indian in María Candelaria. Set in and around the Xochimilco borough of Mexico City, Emilio “El Indio” Fernández’s film idealizes the indigenous populations of Mexico even as it tracks out with fateful implacability their tragic encounters with the prejudices and injustices meted out to them by whites and mestizos alike. In this film the lion’s share of injustice, prejudice, and tragedy befall María Candelaria, the pure but nevertheless reviled daughter of a prostitute, and her beau, Lorenzo Rafael (Pedro Armendáriz). Shot by one of the greatest cinematographers of the twentieth century, Gabriel Figueroa, María Candelaria is not to be missed. Tuesday, April 12th
Stevenson 150, 8 PM
Stevenson 150, 8 PM
For the remainder of the quarter, we will be showing melodramas from different countries each week. Same time, same place. All are welcome. Tell your family, invite your friends.
If you pull this handle...
Out of the blue, a friend I haven't spoken to in years sent me this. It's simply staggering. Had I seen this earlier, Combined and Uneven Apocalypse might have been nothing more than a set of page-shaped paper padding surrounding a DVD of this.
There is a moment - you'll know it when you hit it - when the entire order of vision (that of ink and the hand-built line, with water-colored gray that trembles, that of the cartoon), is thrown literally to the windows edge, where now there is an other world of sight, of photography, above all of the everyday, and it requires only a turning on its axis, a throwing into velocity or freezing, to make it jive and jar with the animation of collapse. (Note: this dislocation happens only after the world as a whole, shot from afar as a gurgling, pustulant, seething thing, blows up in fall. It happens only after the animated world as totality is wrecked.) Nothing I've watched so nails the double sense of apocalypse that always interested me: an end, sure, but an end that means the bringing forth, as if refocusing a lens, lengthening the depth of field, such that the foreground loses out. That which we were here to see finds itself scrambling, like Koko, back from the teeming fact of the street. More than that, such a slippage and disaster occurs here in the formal construction of the thing and its manic incapacity to stay with a figure or theme for more than a moment. The planet will smoke a cigar, but it is not always a head. It was insofar as it smoked a cigar. It is no more.
The only thing that remains constant here is the urge to negate, a drive boiled down into single dog form, an admirable counterpart to the catastrophe-encouraging/deferring lupine gang of Wolfen, an asshole on the grandest scale cousin of Tintin's snowy. But unlike Wolfen, Fitz the Dog manifests just a will to do it all the way (read: a "passion for the Real"), despite the scrambling resistance of his human companion, the Catechon. And do it in proper, whole by part by atom. This small white Fenrir doesn't just bring about Ragnarök. The pup is committed to do it up right, hacking down one of the final trees that stands. The end, therefore, retains shape because of the ceaseless project of breaking binds and bounds. A pointless plan alone makes sense of what otherwise is just a bad storm.
[Two already's and a scattered note:
The earth is already turning, beneath them like a spherical treadmill. We cannot know if there is any traction, if their walking accelerates this, or if it a frictionless gliding. Moonwalking in place.
The earth is already empty. We don't see crowds until after the switch has been pulled.
The sign that hangs warns DO NOT TOUCH EARTH CONTROL: the entire facility is labeled CONTROL OF EARTH. The clown's hands may not be so clean after all. For while the blame is narrowed into a single handle, as if there was one emergency kill switch and the rest was the blameless play of weather, day and night, we notice, on the wall of switches with which Koko plays, one switch for LIGHTNING. And it is exactly lightning we see after Fitz finally succeeds that marks the end of the world: it is the sign of the cut here, a montage filler, a break between scenes of destruction and the apparent cause of all being stood on its head. The point is that the switch is just a fantasy concentration point, the blind that allows us to fumble and fuck with the wall of all the effects of catastrophe without having to claim the moment has yet come. Leave Koko at those switches long enough, and the outcome will be identical.]
So watch this and come apart. Of course, like Koko, you lose your head, and it will not be your own you will first find as solace. We slip into a dark puddle to slosh, without leaving a stain on the filmed desk, for these things may bristle before and aft of each other, but they cannot merge. Back and forth we go over the animator's page, the sea-drunk's rhythm of a conclusion knocked off its axis.
And on the off chance that this not be the case, rest assured, cameras can tilt the horizon, sidewalks can threaten to slide us right off the map, and we know how to wrestle ourselves to the ground and, clawing, desperate, more than a little bufoonish, to pore over the cracks, looking for that missing friction. After all, it's not as if we know how to do otherwise.
[Many thanks, J, for this]
The ruined and the unruined alike
"Of course, the capitalist economy will not simply come to an end. Resisting such an outcome, the great powers will no doubt continue to fight over natural resources and markets. Yet I believe that the Japanese should never again choose such a path."
Karatani, perhaps on the gap between can never again and should never again
In brief, though, a problem that comes up again and again, as this points up a continual elision in thought, including my own at times or often, and visible in Karatani's piece at the telling point of where the article ends (that courage of striding down a new path and the phrase "It may be that only amid the ruins").
Namely, the deadlock between what is necessarily the case
[Only a sequence of ruptures - above all, bloody, terrible, and senseless - and continual failures in the circulation and accumulation of capital, with the attendant disruption in material patterns of everyday life, will visibly mark the limits of a social relation. Limits that have been present for a long while, but regarding which it was worth the while of many to shove further and further out to the horizon. These ruptures and failures may be "human," from mass uprisings to a drawn-out decimation of state services to the increasing impossibility of successful battles over wages, but we do not choose them. They are made, and so too us with them.]
what can only be the case
["Or rather, it is only then that people will, for the first time, truly be able to live"]
and what is not the case
[Namely, that given we know historically about collapse and breakdown, that unless one wants to commit to some notion of "the human spirit" ill-advised, given its track record), disaster - on jerky fast-forward or frame-by-frame, exchange-by-exchange - gives no preference to communism as its recuperation. To say that "The reality, however, is that people who regarded one another with fear when living in the social order created by the state form communities of mutual aid amid the chaos following disaster, a spontaneous type of order that differs from that which exists under the state" may be true in certain instances, when disasters look like disasters, when they are clear and punctual and cannot be mistaken. But such disasters are barely half the story. For when we include in disaster - as we must - things like war, massive inflation, stock market crashes, violent purges, mass unemployment, epidemics, who can remotely say that the general tendency is to stop regarding each other with fear? Who can say that outside of the most immediate circuits of those wrecked and plagued, that disaster bears any necessary relation to a new form of community?
No, it is a worsening, plain and simple and awful.
Yet... one cannot exclude from those infamous "material conditions" that give shape to disastrous or deferred times an enormous set of "subjective" and "affective" conditions: the words that have been in the air, that sense of things getting nastier, that tightening, the networks that exist, the practice one has, the kind of television one might watch and philosophy one might read, the getting-used to not knowing if a day will start and end in a world that feels remotely the same. That is, such a worsening breaks onto a shore that is not a bare fact of economy. We too are rocks of sorts, worn down and smoothed, such that we become channels or levies, but inflections of a break all the same.]
Between these three cases, something like a present.
The point, the vicious fact of it, is that it simply is not our decision. We choose a period of capital as much as we choose an earthquake. To make of this a principle, not of withdrawal but of holding on and forth: such would be a courage, to hate the ruined and the unruined alike, with neither fetish nor indifference, to know that we cannot make our time, but that it does not, and never will, unfold untouched.
"According to what we knew, that tablet should not have been there,"
The permanence of writing is a throwing away (crumpling the pages, oh fuck me, this just doesn't sound right!) and a trash fire.
"Those tablets were not baked, only dried in the sun and [were], therefore, very brittle. ... Basically someone back then threw the tablet in the pit and then burned their garbage," he said. "This fire hardened and preserved the tablet."
But of course...
"The Mycenaeans appear to have used Linear B to record only economic matters of interest to the ruling elite. Fittingly, the markings on the front of the Iklaina tablet appear to form a verb that relates to manufacturing, the researchers say. The back lists names alongside numbers—probably a property list."
But of course. A defaulted account, a score settled, a deal gone wrong, cooked in the flames of other things thrown away. Such are the enduring shards.
And we all fall down
[For those...]
Collapse means falling together.
Think of those trees in Kant which grow straight and tall and do not touch, like the rain of atoms, because there are too many of them, because of competition for the light. The more there are, the more they stand straight and try to not have contact. Vertical, upright, arrows pointing toward noon.
Only one thing is sure: trees don't bear the axes that make them fall. From where the wood of the axe's handle is gathered, though, is another question altogether.
When intellectual montage means a refusal of cutting to or from
The Guardian, with this caption and photo coupling/rift, becomes, for a brief moment, something like Eisenstein with his sharpest of idiosyncratic cuttings. The screenplay:
[Intertitle: The country postponed national parliamentary elections after voting materials failed to arrive in many areas]
Shot: An explosion of oil gushes like a black milk separator. The plenitude is not gathered. A figure in red stands beneath a stormy sky. It is unclear whether or not the small circular ripples in the pool are from rain or from the crude.
That link - failed projects of "democratization" and oil sprouting and falling - is on the order of that elusive intellectual montage of which Eisenstein wrote, because it routes its sense not just between any two at hand (shot 1/shot 2, or shot 1/evoked concept) or even through the gathered energy of the preceding sequence, but through a world order as such. Through the historically particular situation in which one can not only make sense of that linkage between elections delayed-oil bubbling in place, but in which one cannot choose otherwise, as it is not a link of speculation. It is the order of our day, it does not arrive in time yet it does not close. It's the growing dread that despite the talk of the unmappable tangle of capital's totality, what montage may mean now is simply a camera that rests in place, at most turning slowly on its tripod, and that needs no cuts to bring together the incompatible, just a stare long enough to watch the contradictions bubble and belch and fall before it, senseless.
And whether or not this will be intelligible is a problem addressed to another order of montage, one called lower, one called earlier in the progression, one known in the guts. For like all industries, the development of cinema was never a one-way street, and a shock to thought and sensation, if real, will not be registered in either the mind or the body alone, not in the spurring to reflection or in the palpation of the heart. It's in the faulty wiring between the two, the lost microseconds of transition, that seasickness. A film that can bind together voting materials and the gusher will hit us between the spirit and the gray matter, and it will get us in the neck. A dull whiplash, we've grown accustomed. But still...
Something is in the air
[5:00]
A two year span in France, where the end of the world and the end of school both hit their pitch - the moments before the mushroom cloud, the night before the coup - through pieces of white material floating in the air. Perhaps because it nailed the sense of time halted, a breath held and gravity held almost in abeyance, before nothing will be the same again. (Or so the story goes, though the boys climbing the roof know what that after the flags and the expulsions, the world as such will still be there.) Perhaps because nothing that looks that good can happen only one time.
Anti-hero of labor
Despite having plenty of Carnegies, capital has never had a Stakhanov. And it never will, for it cannot.
There are heroes of Labor and there are those who heroically put up with laboring. But capital has no hero of labor, for there is no subject of labor. [See: "Labour capacity has appropriated for itself only the subjective conditions of necessary labour -- the means of subsistence for actively producing labour capacity, i.e. for its reproduction as mere labour capacity separated from the conditions of its realization -- and it has posited these conditions themselves as things, values, which confront it in an alien, commanding personification." Not only does "labour capacity" (read: those who labor) only appropriate for itself (a rather key qualification in the subject-side of things) "subjective conditions", it then posits those conditions, materially and perspectivally, as a set of hostile objects and conditions.] It just wraps gaudier sheets and sharper fences around its stupid, busy vacancy. Nations, comportments, types, allegiances, parties, teams. Class is at once the dodging of this (the declaration of a common identity that needs to "develop" itself) and the threat of mass deixis, a material pointing toward this incoherence, via the act of collective seizure of what surrounds, protects, and produces it. And that process, of seizing and pointing, is not a gathering of common subjects.
If capital slept, it would toss and turn over this, but it does not sleep and it does not worry. Neither do we. All the more hollow a core to crack into view, when historical projects come to the end of their lines, when programs go to shit, when battles go nowhere. It is not our job to provide capital with the keystone essence that it could not provide.
For like capital, communism begins from and turns on a negative anthropology. The difference is that we see no point in denying this. Better to learn to make of the given something than to rummage around for what once may have been.
When those who set out across land come to an ocean, after miles of textured land, thickets, groves, and plateaus, they often build right there, on the edge of that huge shifting void, barred from the land but with the promise of crossing and an idea of arrivals from places that couldn't yet be found or mapped. A notion that declares a massive nothing yet which, in matter and fact, is always busy, generative, dangerous, never pristine or unused. Not an outside but the premise of transfer. Because, at the end of it, even continents are islands.
So too do we, sprained and dusty, making our home next to this terrible emptiness whose wind we've sensed for a long while, that only now is coming into to view.
Hostility directed toward hostile things by means of other hostile things (including one's laboring, consuming, or resting body) turned to that purpose of taking to pieces
Office Worker Goes Absolutely Insane - Watch more Funny Videos
[thanks, Chris, for that initial ballet of workplace fury]
Damned if you do
Overhead yesterday:
"My doctor said I can't eat chocolate or nuts because of this cold sore [gesturing to the red weep accenting the mouth], because, you know, I've got herpes. But I have this whole jar of Nutella just sitting on my desk. So I don't know what to do. I'm screwed."
Oh, America, you swath of Ur-urges.
| In the name of These States, shall I scorn the antique? | |
| Why These are the children of the antique, to justify it. |
One-man many-voice band
Who was in there with you?
No one, I was just singing by myself.
I know about the heads. I mean who were you talking to?
Oh, the camera! The camera...
But there is nothing to say to a camera.
It's true, there's just a slightly dimmed reflection of you and three and a couple spaces below a table and not a gout of blood in sight.
Don't forget the banjo. I broke another banjo.
Ah yes, the camera...
World Melodrama Film Series Presents The Scarlet Empress (1934)
And so it begins. New film series from Erik and me, starting next week. Kicking off with a hay-chewing, soldier-screwing, monstrous statue-looming, inexplicable coup-succeeding bang. If you live afar, time to start following along as we set off a 10 week sprint to prove that melodrama may be the undervalued genre of the last century, at least if you like your films as ornamental, formally disjunctive, kinky, and suspiciously anarchic as I do.
“Your husband doesn’t mean a thing to you.”
“He does. I’ll always be faithful to him.”
“Don’t be absurd. Those ideas are old-fashioned. This is the eighteenth century.”
“He does. I’ll always be faithful to him.”
“Don’t be absurd. Those ideas are old-fashioned. This is the eighteenth century.”
We’re starting the series off this quarter with Josef von Sternberg’s remarkably stylish and overheated costume film, The Scarlet Empress, which is nominally about the events and backdoor machinations leading up to the assassination of Peter III and the ascension to the throne of Catherine II (a.k.a., the Great) in mid eighteenth-century Russia. What this perfunctory plot summary leaves out, however, is everything that makes this film a seminal example of historical melodrama, from the smutty upstairs-downstairs nocturnal comings-and-goings to the extravagant ornamental details that overwhelm almost every scene to Marlene Dietrich’s breathless naïf who proves to be a very quick study when it comes to learning both how to rule a foreign country as vast as Russia and how to win that country’s military over to her side, one soldier at a time.
Tuesday, April 5th
Stevenson 150, 8 PM
2012 comes a year early
My black book is now real and tangible, feeling a bit like a time capsule lobbed by me a year ago into this now. (A consequence of this is a set of incidents, cultural material, shifts in my own thinking, etc, that are not present in the book. When the time comes, I'll write a post-script/addendum/self-rebuttal.) Real thanks to everyone who helped me turn this mess into a somewhat polished slab of obsidian, neon, and bile.
My sadness, unsurprised but still, is only that what may have appeared to some as merely a rhetorical gesture of sorts - a punning title, a détourned theory, a silly bellicosity, a cute catastrophism for the fuck of it - has, in the year since I finished writing, shown itself all the more to be as deadly serious as I meant it to be. Would that it had turned out to have been just a bad joke.
It's been a long end of days, and we've got a long, long way to go. As always, it's communism or catastrophe. That's it. And in this case, there's no and/or in sight.
In the meantime, get your spades, comrades, and let's start digging, upwards this time.
ECW
1) Law Defeated
[back from Mexico City. Deep thanks to everyone there for hospitality, introductions, mezcal, and making me feel entirely at home, albeit happily unmoored, in a place I hope to call home from time to time for a long while to come.]
1940 still life by Paramount photographer Whitey Schafer, constituted of elements banned from publicity shots by the Production Code Administration. Said elements?
1) Law Defeated
2) Inside of Thigh
3) Lace Lingerie
4) Dead Man
5) Narcotics
6) Drinking
7) Exposed Bosom
8) Gambling
9) Pointing Gun
10) Tommy Gun
These forbidden elements - basically coming together under the form of a thigh or bosom baring woman capable of offing an officer and enjoying it or, in a different register, an audience enjoying that act and its surrounding materials - declared in a period in which watching together meant sitting through this (from Doherty's Pre-code Hollywood: Sex, immorality, and insurrection in American cinema 1930-1934):
If there is popular cinema, then, between the undefeated law held to the side, its thighs wrapped up tight, and the toxic vacuity of No, we'll take a cab..., if there is a dodge between the two doomed options (1. do not engage whatsoever with the terrain of the generally watched and hence lack determinate coordinates of any present, or 2. fall into the idiocy of thinking that there is anything worth saying about the minor modulations of one more iteration of Minor Family and Ego Problems of Rich Attractive People Getting Themselves Into a Pickle Such That They May End With a Slightly Quirky But Ultimately Solid Shoring Up of Various Social Institutions In Accordance With What Daddy Says Is Best or Capital Used to Hire "Skilled Labor" and to Produce the Digital Semblance of Frozen Labor Being Blown Into Fiery Bits by the Actions of Those in Pursuit of Illegal Access to Capital 2: The Second Coming), if there is a stepping through to sit down better, it will find its footing here:
A riot of catcalls and wails which drowned out most of the dialogue...
And that is how to attend and attend to, to watch without waiting to see.
[To follow: yes, but what about the money exchanged for the experience, however boisterous and pressure-releasing it may feel to be?]
1940 still life by Paramount photographer Whitey Schafer, constituted of elements banned from publicity shots by the Production Code Administration. Said elements?
1) Law Defeated
2) Inside of Thigh
3) Lace Lingerie
4) Dead Man
5) Narcotics
6) Drinking
7) Exposed Bosom
8) Gambling
9) Pointing Gun
10) Tommy Gun
These forbidden elements - basically coming together under the form of a thigh or bosom baring woman capable of offing an officer and enjoying it or, in a different register, an audience enjoying that act and its surrounding materials - declared in a period in which watching together meant sitting through this (from Doherty's Pre-code Hollywood: Sex, immorality, and insurrection in American cinema 1930-1934):
If there is popular cinema, then, between the undefeated law held to the side, its thighs wrapped up tight, and the toxic vacuity of No, we'll take a cab..., if there is a dodge between the two doomed options (1. do not engage whatsoever with the terrain of the generally watched and hence lack determinate coordinates of any present, or 2. fall into the idiocy of thinking that there is anything worth saying about the minor modulations of one more iteration of Minor Family and Ego Problems of Rich Attractive People Getting Themselves Into a Pickle Such That They May End With a Slightly Quirky But Ultimately Solid Shoring Up of Various Social Institutions In Accordance With What Daddy Says Is Best or Capital Used to Hire "Skilled Labor" and to Produce the Digital Semblance of Frozen Labor Being Blown Into Fiery Bits by the Actions of Those in Pursuit of Illegal Access to Capital 2: The Second Coming), if there is a stepping through to sit down better, it will find its footing here:
A riot of catcalls and wails which drowned out most of the dialogue...
And that is how to attend and attend to, to watch without waiting to see.
[To follow: yes, but what about the money exchanged for the experience, however boisterous and pressure-releasing it may feel to be?]
Mexico City
I'm going to Mexico City tomorrow night. I've never been before, am thrilled. If anyone has recommendations, friends I might want to meet, or happens to be there in the same too few days I'll be, write me and let me know. S a/o B, that shadow of mine, will return when I do, despite its stated desire to not come back.
ECW
To axes, then.
In addition, we might add:
These days, they pass through a long winter.
To make matters worse, we are neither a closed nor an open system, but a closed system with little rooms that suddenly open - one way only, it seems - to the outside as to a maw to gorge what we are done eating.
Inside, but not inside that room as such with that hole, there's coffee that tastes like burning, in small cups with red straws to stir what blurs enough on its own. So things are fine.
Such that there is always the possibility of exit, of a throwing forth onto the tracks, thereby making us a tidy vaccum (more will exit than will enter and it is only knowing such a passage must have an end that keeps skulls from turning in on themselves, mewing in pain), thereby acting like what we do not see and what is spread diffuse, a slo-mo miasma, what we will not see, how could we not go on? How could this not roll forever?
But sometimes those little yawning exits gets blocked and frozen solid, and we are reminded that as soon as the point of transfer (the "getting exterior" part of things) toward the vast beyond is backed up a bit, this is a very stinking, very crowded box we have built for ourselves. Something appears to be seeping out beneath the door of that little room. Refuse has been shredded into delicate piles, either for distraction or as nests lull the growing number of rodents - fuck, where were they hiding all this time? - into napping and at least leaving those wires be.
And we will go nowhere until it is spring outside or until we admit - or those delegated to admit for us, such that we at best remove a layer and huff a bit - that it will take those who have already left the train, those with axes and a laugh, those with no manners, that the outside has conditions of its own. And what we fling out as we fling through space will go nowhere but gather, crystal viscous and thick around our prized yet shat-upon/through "disposal points," it will gather in dumb solidarity with those gathered inside, both sides - the inside stuck matted to the outside, and the inside that continues to be only because it has an outside to yank from and spew into - equally stupid, their drawing breath further wetting the fogged glass.
To axes, then.
Pendulum [Catalogue description beamed back from after the decline of the West]
TITLE: Pendulum
Artists: The New Pessimism
Dimensions variable. Height: three inches to one mile in length. Width: one centimeter to three inches. Total field of interaction: 2.0943951 cubic miles, plus spray zone (indeterminate)
Materials: Titanium, linear cold generator, magnetized oxide, lubricant (pivot); water, soot, blood, marrow, plastic, feather, excrement, milk, tobacco, glass, bile, wood, pork, sucrose, urine, brick, rubber, ice (pendulum)
Pendulum is, in essence, a simple work. It was first installed off-site, approximately 18 miles from Head Gallery, thirteen years ago, and it remains off-property. (That is, it cannot be said to “belong” to the gallery. The gallery legally owns the small assemblage of material that constitutes the pivot point, but through the ingenious use of some lesser-known Intellectual Property Statutes introduced with the Geneva Convention, the “concept” of the work is excluded from status as either common or private property. It literally belongs to no one, although in an accompanying audio tape, the artists stated that “it belongs, as it always did, to the flabby futility of binding science to thought.”)
The work is best described as falling between an inconstant object, a process piece, and a performance without subjects involved. Floating one mile above the ground without tether, a single graphite lubed pivot point hangs in the air: an assemblage of small magnets keep it perfectly centered over the installation site To this pivot is attached a rather crude early version of the linear cold generator, swaying free and pointing its pin-sized beam toward the ground below. A certain quantity of water is gathered around the pivot, where it remains frozen hard. However, temperature differentials in the surrounding air cause the outer surface of this small ice lump to melt slightly. Given the force of gravity, this condensation drips downward, bead by bead, where it immediately freezes around the line of the cold. What was a blob starts to resemble a short icicle. This process continues, and Pendulum begins to deform into a thin ray of ice extending toward the earth. Naturally occurring wind currents, augmented by the disturbance of the ultra-cold beam cutting through them, exert pressure on the pendulum, and it begins to swing. The momentum of the swing drives the moisture further toward the tip, where it refreezes. Hence, with every swing, the pendulum grows longer and longer. It describes a wider and wider arc, whistling over the heads of the city. It comes closer and closer to the ground, and to the marked zone directly one-mile below the pivot point. One of two outcomes occurs: either the combination of wind pressure and unstable freezing causes the pendulum to break loose during one of its swings, or it grows downward until, with an oddly delicate and splintering crash, the pendulum strikes the earth and shatters into thousands of shards, droplets, and, given the combined effect of friction and ground temperature, bits of melting slush, all accompanied by a hiss of steam.
Pendulum has remained a controversial work since its inception. It has killed numerous spectators (the current total stands at 241), although such death, common to most works of our period, has little to do with the controversy. Rather, a brief consideration of its history, including some of the deaths incurred, give a useful point of entrance to discuss the accusations made against the piece.
First and foremost, the piece has been attacked as a work of neo-Nazi propaganda. Such an accusation derives from the obvious fact that it is based on the Welteislehre (“World Ice Doctrine”) of Hans Hörbiger, which claimed that the solar system had its origin when a dead wet star smashed into a larger star, its scattered vapors condensing into ice that became the fundamental material of the solar system. (Ice planets, ice moons, ice ether). An Austrian steam engineer, Hörbiger's “glacial cosmogony” found favor with the Third Reich as a counter-theory to the “Jewish science” of Einstein, for the rather simple reason that despite being entirely unfounded, it nevertheless provided a seeming accordance: white northern tribes from the frozen north and a solar system founded upon frozen white material. (Moreover, its lack of accordance with observational phenomena only bolstered its intransigent truth-claims, at least according to Hörbiger, who told Willy Ley: “Either you believe in me and learn, or you will be treated as the enemy.”) The origin of such a theory came from two moments in Hörbiger's life: first, when he looked at the moon and realized that it looked rather like ice and, second, when he dreamed of an ice pendulum swinging through the emptiness of space, growing longer and longer, until it broke free. It is from the latter that Pendulum takes its essential determination.
However, to call such this work “neo-Fascist” is to ignore a) the general incoherence of such a designation for the contemporary moment, and b) the way in which the work points toward the petulant obstinacy and total impurity of such a theory. Regarding the latter points, we should keep in mind that Hörbiger's theory is not a general thermodynamics but a description of a single exception, a regime of ice struggling against an entire universe with which it does not accord. It is the petty flailing of a thought which would like to remain pure and cannot. And as for that purity, it should also be kept in mind that condensation forms around a particle of “other” material: that “pure white ice” coheres only because of the included elements of the “filth” it disdains. This general point, along with the particular fact that Pendulum accumulates a range of filth and refuse both in its passage through the air and in its mopping up from the streets below, had evidently been forgotten by the first victims of Pendulum. Respectfully keeping their distance from the point of impact yet standing close enough to be splattered by its slushy outburst, they opened their mouths in hope of enacting a sort of ecstatic, sexless money shot. They were rewarded with a combination of frozen material, ranging from atmospheric sulphur compounds and a not insignificant quantity of irradiated bird droppings, that immediately corroded their stomach lining and internal organs. It should be noted the blood and other bodily fluids which leaked from their orifices were among the liquids gathered and frozen into the next iteration of Pendulum.
Second, due in equal part to such incidents of “obscene splattering” and the general shape of the work, Pendulum has been called a “pathetically phallic” piece, a “fantasy of erection unbound by physiological constraints.” The curators would not disagree, except to point out that the “pathetic” inflection is one critically engaged by the piece. Aside from the needle-like slenderness of the pendulum blade and its extreme fragility, it need be remarked only that it cannot be predicted where, when, and how it will break. If it is a manifestation of phallic law, the model it seems to propose is one of inconstancy, instability, and the impossibility of founding any order of pleasure, reason, or meaning whatsoever.
Third, Pendulum is often considered to belong, however loosely, to the Inhuman School. The supposed personal connections of some of the artists gives further credence to this, but as we see in how the work pre-engages each of its accusations, nearly posing them itself in order to render them idiotic, it is ultimately a scathing attack on that entire enterprise. The reason for our assertion has to do not with the work itself during its period of descent (which, indeed, has thoughtlessly cut through scores of bystanders with a bloody thwup and decimated nearby buildings, with neither malevolence nor care) or with the “apparent” symbolic weight of the piece (which, indeed, gestures to a clock-less pendulum counting a deep time beyond the scope of human metrics), but with the interim stage of its recomposition. It is the explicit instructions of the artists that after Pendulum has scattered its accumulated frozen matter, the process is to be restarted only in one of two ways.
1. It may be left to its own devices, with the chance prospect that enough moisture will gather near the pivot to recommence: the last instance in which such a decision was made led to a seven year period in which Pendulum did not swing.
2. The gallery workers have to do it themselves by means of sponges, buckets, and scaffolding, thereby rendering such an inhuman event dependent on the banal labor of the underpaid or unpaid. No aerial transport or machines whatsoever are to be used in setting up Pendulum to swing again. Hence it is has not been uncommon that during the laborious task of recollecting the dirty and toxic water, it is suddenly discovered that the oscillating glint above the installation site is, in fact, a reconstituted Pendulum, having gathered enough moisture and smoke in the clouds above to have begun its downward sweep once more.
Fourth and finally, Pendulum has been hailed – less accused than acclaimed – as the assertion of the power of speculation after the end of a civilizational sequence, a razor of rationality sweeping through the dark night, as it “cuts through folly and false images of human importance” and discovers “a project for thought after the collapse of any and all philosophy.” It should be pointed out that a grosser misreading is scarcely fathomable.
If the sprays of stinking slush and the recurrent sloppy, pointless, and humid killings – which point only to the incapacity to not do otherwise – were not enough to dismiss this accusation, one of the stranger instances in Pendulum's history should suffice. The report of one present reads:
" On its nineteenth cycle, a large crowd had gathered, variously drunken, hushed, rowdy, reverential, and curious, for the predicted moment when full contact with the ground would be made on the nadir of its swing. Some stood close and stared at the scarred point where the scrape and break should occur. Others held back, wisely dressed in oil skins or rubber to stay safe while getting the full visceral brunt of the splatter. I, for one, was bare-chested and forcing myself to wheeze: word on the street of late was that for those, like myself, with the sickness, those nasty compounds and ice-cured bacteria were one of the few remedies capable of shocking the body back into line. Around 11:33 PM, having previously swung through the collected mass, thereby splitting them by default into two sides facing off against one another, Pendulum sliced back down, stretched thin and sharp, with a high, keening whistle. The crowd braced and tightened, the suicidal opened their mouths and bared their chests. And it stopped: through the rarest combination of rigidity, exact length, weight, inflection, and momentum, Pendulum scraped and skidded to an absolute halt, perfectly vertical, utterly fragile yet unbroken, tracing a radiant, glittering line from the center of the earth out to the pivot. Nothing moved. The crowd gaped. Very slowly, a slight trickle of melt became evident, as the sheer idiocy of this 'pure reason' began, once more, to slur into a stream of reeking slush. Soon, there was little left but a slightly chilled brackish puddle between the fuming earth and the torpid air."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





















